Open Lens News

Trump’s Tariff Turmoil: Court Ruling Sparks Fury and Economic Fears

President Donald Trump’s aggressive trade policies have once again taken center stage, this time igniting a firestorm of controversy and concern. A recent ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade has blocked the administration’s sweeping tariffs, citing a lack of constitutional authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This decision has not only enraged Trump but also cast a long shadow over the nation’s economic outlook.

The court’s unanimous decision on May 28, 2025, permanently enjoined the government from enforcing the tariffs. The panel ruled that the IEEPA does not delegate sufficient power from Congress to the president to create tariffs, emphasizing that such authority must be explicitly granted and limited by Congress. In response, Trump expressed his fury, warning that the ruling could lead to “economic ruination” and leave the U.S. vulnerable to retaliatory tariffs from other nations.

Economists and market analysts are also sounding alarms. The uncertainty surrounding the tariffs has contributed to a significant spike in the Economic Policy Uncertainty Index, reaching levels not seen since the pandemic-induced recession. This heightened uncertainty is causing businesses to hesitate on investments and hiring, potentially slowing economic growth.

The Federal Reserve has acknowledged the challenges posed by the tariff disputes. Chair Jerome Powell noted that the policies have tilted the U.S. economy toward slower growth and higher inflation, leaving policymakers with limited clarity on the future economic trajectory.

Financial markets are also feeling the impact. The British pound surged to a three-year high against the U.S. dollar, while gold prices rose amid increased trade tensions and a weakening dollar. Investors are seeking safer assets as they navigate the turbulent economic landscape.

While the court ruling represents a significant check on presidential power, it also underscores the deep divisions and uncertainties surrounding U.S. trade policy. As the legal battle continues, the nation faces the dual challenge of restoring confidence in its economic policies and ensuring that trade practices align with constitutional principles.

In the coming weeks, the administration is expected to appeal the decision, potentially bringing the matter before the Supreme Court. The outcome of this legal saga will not only shape the future of U.S. trade policy but also determine the trajectory of the nation’s economic health in an increasingly interconnected world.

Scroll to Top